<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Tech on dhewi</title>
    <link>https://www.dhewi.co.uk/categories/tech/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Tech on dhewi</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.125.7</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 11:43:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.dhewi.co.uk/categories/tech/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>An AI Writing Transparency Declaration</title>
      <link>https://www.dhewi.co.uk/posts/ai-writing-transparency-declaration/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 11:43:32 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.dhewi.co.uk/posts/ai-writing-transparency-declaration/</guid>
      <description>This, here, is a good exercise and analysis for any of us who write online (or write at all, I suppose, but for most of us that’s online).
Blink if you’re human
If you haven’t read it before reading this – and you should read it at some point, at least – it teases apart what could count as “writing with AI”, and argues that rather than either getting all ban-heavy, or requiring labelling of AI-written material, better simply for those of us who write for ourselves to be transparent about how we do what we do.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Artificial Thinking Is Not Out There Yet</title>
      <link>https://www.dhewi.co.uk/posts/artificial-thinking-is-not-out-there-yet/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:58:34 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.dhewi.co.uk/posts/artificial-thinking-is-not-out-there-yet/</guid>
      <description>Wrestling with the theory of Artificial Intelligence is not a new thing. Two books have occupied space in my head for many years now that still have some of the best questions, at least –
The Emperor’s New Mind Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid What they have in common is that they attempt to deal with consciousness, and they take Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem as a basis for it.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From Airbrush to AI</title>
      <link>https://www.dhewi.co.uk/posts/from-airbrush-to-ai/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:44:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.dhewi.co.uk/posts/from-airbrush-to-ai/</guid>
      <description>When I was at school, I was oddly serious about school projects.
I had a mild obsession with making them look like professional books or brochures. We didn&amp;rsquo;t have a computer, but I steered my parents into getting a proportional-spacing typewriter and used that (which dates this), and a photocopier to change sizing of chunks of text.
I also scraped together enough cash to get a DeVilbiss Super 63A airbrush, an old second-hand compressor, and rigged a system that let me use the compressed air at my homemade homework desk.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
